Extending bidict
#
Bidict was written with extensibility in mind.
Let’s look at some examples.
YoloBidict
Recipe#
If you’d like
ON_DUP_DROP_OLD
to be the default on_dup
behavior
(for __init__()
,
__setitem__()
, and
update()
),
you can use the following recipe:
>>> from bidict import bidict, ON_DUP_DROP_OLD
>>> class YoloBidict(bidict):
... on_dup = ON_DUP_DROP_OLD
>>> b = YoloBidict({'one': 1})
>>> b['two'] = 1 # succeeds, no ValueDuplicationError
>>> b
YoloBidict({'two': 1})
>>> b.update({'three': 1}) # ditto
>>> b
YoloBidict({'three': 1})
Of course, YoloBidict
’s inherited
put()
and
putall()
methods
still allow specifying a custom OnDup
per call via the on_dup argument,
and will both still default to raising for all duplication types.
Further demonstrating bidict
’s extensibility,
to make an OrderedYoloBidict
,
the class above can simply inherit from
bidict.OrderedBidict
rather than bidict.bidict
.
Beware of ON_DUP_DROP_OLD
#
There’s a good reason that bidict
does not provide a YoloBidict
out of the box.
Before you decide to use a YoloBidict
in your own code,
beware of the following potentially unexpected, dangerous behavior:
>>> b = YoloBidict({'one': 1, 'two': 2}) # b contains two items
>>> b['one'] = 2 # update one of the items
>>> b # now b only has one item!
YoloBidict({'one': 2})
As covered in Collapsing Overwrites, setting an existing key to the value of a different existing item causes both existing items to quietly collapse into a single new item.
The opposite customization would look something like:
>>> from bidict import ON_DUP_RAISE
>>> class YodoBidict(bidict): # yodo: you only die once!
... on_dup = ON_DUP_RAISE
>>> b = YodoBidict({'one': 1})
>>> b['one'] = 2 # Unlike a regular bidict, YodoBidict won't allow this.
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
bidict.KeyDuplicationError: one
>>> b
YodoBidict({'one': 1})
>>> b.forceput('one', 2) # Any type of overwrite requires more force.
>>> b
YodoBidict({'one': 2})
WeakrefBidict
Recipe#
Suppose you need to store some objects in a bidict without incrementing their refcounts.
With BidictBase
's
_fwdm_cls
(forward mapping class) and
_invm_cls
(inverse mapping class) attributes,
accomplishing this is as simple as:
>>> from bidict import MutableBidict
>>> from weakref import WeakKeyDictionary, WeakValueDictionary
>>> class WeakrefBidict(MutableBidict):
... _fwdm_cls = WeakKeyDictionary
... _invm_cls = WeakValueDictionary
Now you can insert items into WeakrefBidict without incrementing their refcounts:
>>> b = WeakrefBidict()
>>> o1, o2 = frozenset({1}), frozenset({2})
>>> b[o1] = o2
Since o1 and o2 are the only strong references to these objects, if you delete these references, the refcounts will go to zero and the objects will immediately be deallocated on CPython, since the WeakrefBidict isn’t holding on to them:
>>> del o1, o2 # after this, b immediately becomes empty on CPython:
>>> if sys.implementation.name == 'cpython':
... assert not b
SortedBidict
Recipes#
Suppose you need a bidict that maintains its items in sorted order. The Python standard library does not include any sorted dict types, but the excellent sortedcontainers and sortedcollections libraries do.
Using these, along with BidictBase
’s
_fwdm_cls
(forward mapping class) and
_invm_cls
(inverse mapping class) attributes,
creating a sorted bidict is simple:
>>> from sortedcontainers import SortedDict
>>> class SortedBidict(MutableBidict):
... """A sorted bidict whose forward items stay sorted by their keys,
... and whose inverse items stay sorted by *their* keys.
... Note: As a result, an instance and its inverse yield their items
... in different orders.
... """
... _fwdm_cls = SortedDict
... _invm_cls = SortedDict
>>> b = SortedBidict({'Tokyo': 'Japan', 'Cairo': 'Egypt'})
>>> b
SortedBidict({'Cairo': 'Egypt', 'Tokyo': 'Japan'})
>>> b['Lima'] = 'Peru'
>>> list(b.items()) # stays sorted by key
[('Cairo', 'Egypt'), ('Lima', 'Peru'), ('Tokyo', 'Japan')]
>>> list(b.inverse.items()) # .inverse stays sorted by *its* keys (b's values)
[('Egypt', 'Cairo'), ('Japan', 'Tokyo'), ('Peru', 'Lima')]
Here’s a recipe for a sorted bidict whose forward items stay sorted by their keys, and whose inverse items stay sorted by their values. i.e. An instance and its inverse will yield their items in the same order:
>>> from sortedcollections import ValueSortedDict
>>> class KeySortedBidict(MutableBidict):
... _fwdm_cls = SortedDict
... _invm_cls = ValueSortedDict
>>> elem_by_atomicnum = KeySortedBidict({
... 6: 'carbon', 1: 'hydrogen', 2: 'helium'})
>>> list(elem_by_atomicnum.items()) # stays sorted by key
[(1, 'hydrogen'), (2, 'helium'), (6, 'carbon')]
>>> list(elem_by_atomicnum.inverse.items()) # .inverse stays sorted by value
[('hydrogen', 1), ('helium', 2), ('carbon', 6)]
>>> elem_by_atomicnum[4] = 'beryllium'
>>> list(elem_by_atomicnum.inverse.items())
[('hydrogen', 1), ('helium', 2), ('beryllium', 4), ('carbon', 6)]
Automatic “Get Attribute” Pass-Through#
Python makes it easy to customize a class’s “get attribute” behavior.
You can take advantage of this to pass attribute access
through to the backing _fwdm
mapping
when an attribute is not provided by the bidict class itself:
>>> def __getattribute__(self, name):
... try:
... return object.__getattribute__(self, name)
... except AttributeError:
... return getattr(self._fwdm, name)
>>> KeySortedBidict.__getattribute__ = __getattribute__
Now, even though this KeySortedBidict
itself provides no peekitem
attribute,
you can still call peekitem
on it
and it will return the result of calling peekitem
on the backing SortedDict
:
>>> elem_by_atomicnum.peekitem()
(6, 'carbon')
Dynamic Inverse Class Generation#
When a bidict class’s
_fwdm_cls
and
_invm_cls
are the same,
the bidict class is its own inverse class.
(This is the case for all the
bidict classes
that come with bidict
.)
However, when a bidict’s
_fwdm_cls
and
_invm_cls
differ,
as in the KeySortedBidict
and WeakrefBidict
recipes above,
the inverse class of the bidict
needs to have its
_fwdm_cls
and
_invm_cls
swapped.
BidictBase
detects this
and dynamically computes the correct inverse class for you automatically.
You can see this if you inspect KeySortedBidict
’s inverse bidict:
>>> elem_by_atomicnum.inverse.__class__.__name__
'KeySortedBidictInv'
Notice that BidictBase
automatically created a
KeySortedBidictInv
class and used it for the inverse bidict.
As expected, KeySortedBidictInv
’s
_fwdm_cls
and
_invm_cls
are the opposite of KeySortedBidict
’s:
>>> elem_by_atomicnum.inverse._fwdm_cls.__name__
'ValueSortedDict'
>>> elem_by_atomicnum.inverse._invm_cls.__name__
'SortedDict'
BidictBase
also ensures that round trips work as expected:
>>> KeySortedBidictInv = elem_by_atomicnum.inverse.__class__ # i.e. a value-sorted bidict
>>> atomicnum_by_elem = KeySortedBidictInv(elem_by_atomicnum.inverse)
>>> atomicnum_by_elem
KeySortedBidictInv({'hydrogen': 1, 'helium': 2, 'beryllium': 4, 'carbon': 6})
>>> KeySortedBidict(atomicnum_by_elem.inverse) == elem_by_atomicnum
True
This all goes to show how simple it can be
to compose your own bidirectional mapping types
out of the building blocks that bidict
provides.